Advertisement
Hi all. I don't want to waste the wood ash from my fire but it is so fine I'm affraid it will block up the pores in the soil. What do you all suggest? Cheers Max Australia
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Mon, August 22, 2011 - 7:37 PMI mix it in my mulch pile, seems to add a nice touch, not too much where the water runs off or clogs up
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Tue, August 23, 2011 - 3:39 AMwe use ashes on the driveway in winter as an alternative to salt. (make sure there are no nails in the ashes!).
not so useful for australia tho, eh?
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Wed, August 24, 2011 - 2:56 AMit so depends on the type of soil you have and also how well you mix it. leaving it on the surface causes it to change chemically and it becomes caustic. always mix in if you can or at least cover.
My beds that will get wood ash once or twice a year always thive better than those without. The minerals are welcome, as long as they can be absorbed.
Dont let the ash touch plants directly, and always make sure its mixed in or at least not exposed to air/direct water. -
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Wed, August 24, 2011 - 8:53 AM>Dont let the ash touch plants directly<
hm. I have used wood ash (not paper ash) to remove aphids from my roses for decades. works great and doesn't burn the plants at all. I just sprinkle a handful onto the buds that happen to be covered in aphids, and >poof< they die or disappear into the ether asap. -
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Thu, August 25, 2011 - 3:19 AMhm, interesting. My trusty gardening book from the 50's warns destinctly against it. Maybe they mean roots and stem etc..?
I'll try that with the wood ash against aphids next time, sounds handy (since I always have wood ash on hand). I dont have much of an aphid problem though.. -
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Thu, August 25, 2011 - 4:01 AMmaybe the concern is lye? isn't lye made by leaching ashes?
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Thu, August 25, 2011 - 9:01 AMcertainly the ash I put on gets washed off into the soil around the roses, but I've never seen any harm come to them at all and I only apply a handful once or twice a year. I don't have an aphid problem anywhere else in my garden, except for these 2 roses which I secretly hate (as plants, but I love the smell of the flowers).
originally it was my chimney sweep who told me to use the wood ash on them -- of course he also said roses often grow out of fireplace ash boxes, and when he showed me his, it was an Azalea. LOL. but even that surprised me since I believed ash to be alkaline, and Rhododendrons to like acidity. ?
-
-
-
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Fri, August 26, 2011 - 1:47 PMWith the recent radioactivity increase from the Japanese accident, I would not use wood ash for anything you might later eat.
This is from an article back in 1991:
While cleaning ashes from his fireplace two years ago, Stewart A. Farber mused that if trees filter and store airborne pollutants, they might also harbor fallout from the nuclear weapons tests of the 1950s and 1060s. On a whim, he brought some of his fireplace ash to Yankee Atomic Electric Co.'s environmental lab in Bolton, Mass., where he manages environmental monitoring. Farber says he was amazed to discover that his sample showed the distinctive cesium and strontium "signatures" of nuclear fallout - and that the concentration of radioactivity "was easily 100 times greater than anything [our lab] had ever seen in an environmental sample."
Since then, he has obtained wood-ash radioactivity assays from 16 other scientists across the nation. These 47 data sets, representing trees in 14 states, suggest that fallout in wood ash "is a major source of radioactivity released into the environment," Farber says. With the exception of some very low California readings, all measurements of ash with fallout-cesium exceeded - some by 100 times or more - the levels of radioactive cesium that may be released from nuclear plants (about 100 picocuries per kilogram of sludge). Ash-cesium levels were especially high in the Northeast - probably because naturally high levels of nonradioactive cesium in the soil discourage trees from releasing fallout-derived cesium through their roots, he says.
Industrial wood burning in the United States generates an estimated 900,000 tons of ash each year; residential and utility wood burning generates another 543,000 tons. Already, many companies are recycling this unregulated ash in fertilizers. The irony, Farber says, is that federal regulations require releases from nuclear plants to be disposed of as radioactive wastes if they contain even 1 percent of the cesium and strontium levels detected in the ash samples from New England. If ash were subject to the same regulations, he says, its disposal would cost U.S. wood burners more than $30 billion annually.
COPYRIGHT 1991 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1991, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company. -
-
Re: Wood ash uses and dangers
Sat, May 12, 2012 - 12:55 AMFUKUSHIMA FALLOUT TRIVIAL:
I am the Stewart Farber mentioned below. I conducted the study cited below about nuclear weapon's test fallout in the 1950s and 1960s being taken up by trees, resulting in wood ash having elevated levels of radioactive isotopes, including Cesium-137. The accident in Japan is of no concern since the levels of fallout are so absolutely trivial, outside of small areas in Japan.
The fallout from Fukushima after the accident is not enough to even maintain the environmental inventory of what is already there from previous nuclear weapons testing. Each year what is already in the environment everywhere outside Japan is decaying away. The amount of previous bomb test fallout decaying each year is MUCH more than that which is being added from Japan. Cesium-137 only has a 30 year half life so what is already in the environment will disappear by a factor of 50% in 30 years. Since there is much more Cs-137 in the environment already, and so little fallout from the Japan accident is being deposited now, the total amount of Cs-137 in the environment will only BE GOING DOWN EACH YEAR from this time.
-